Monday, February 27, 2017

The Lord is holy! He is our righteousness! He is our purifier!

Refiner & Purifier (Mal3:3) Growth
Holy-Isa6:3; 57:15
Holy & Reverend-Ps111:9
Holy & True-Rev6:10
Holy One & the Just-Acts2:27; 3:14
Holy One of Israel-Isa49:7
Jehovah-Mekaddishkem (The Lord our Sanctifier)-Lev20:8
Jesus Christ the Righteous-1Jn2:1
Lamb without Blemish-1Pt1:19
Lord our Righteousness-Jer23:6
Mediator of the New Covenant-Heb12:24
Minister of the Sancuary-Heb8:2
Most Holy-Dan9:24
Propititation for our Sins-1Jn2:2
Ransom-Mk10:45
Redeemer-Isa59:20
Root out of Dry Ground-Isa53:2
Tender Grass-2Sam23:4

Vine-Jn15:1,5
The Lord is truly our foundation, our rock and strong tower! We can take comfort in Him!

A Sure Foundation (Isa28:16) Stability
Covenent of the People-Isa42:6
Fortress-Ps18:2
Foundation-Isa28:16
My Rock of Refuge-Ps31:2
My Stay-2Sam22:19; Ps18:18
Refuge from the Stork-Isa25:4
Rock of my Salvation-2Sam22:7
Sanctuary-Isa8:14
Strong Lord-Ps89:8
Strong Tower-Nah1:7
Surety-Heb7:22

That Spiritual Rock-1Cor10:4

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Greetings! It's been too long since my last blog entry. Thought that I would post several entries on the names of God/El #namesofgod that we find in the scriptures! My hope in that through we can come to understand, know, love and take comfort in our Lord/Elohim #lord #elohim in a more perfect and complete way!

Ps. 91:14 Because he hath set his love upon me, therefore will I deliver him: I will set him on high, because he hath known my name.

A Wall of Fire (Zech2:5) Protection
Brightness of His Glory-Heb1:3
Consuming Fire-Heb12:29
Cover from the Tempest-Isa32:2
Flame-Isa10:17
Hiding Place From the Wind-Isa32:2
Jehovah-Nissi (the Lord is my banner)-Ex17:15
Jehova-Shammah (the Lord is there)-Ez48:35
My High Tower-Ps144:2
My Shield-Ps115:11
Refiner & Purifier-Mal3:3
Refuge from the Storm-Isa25:4
Shade-Ps121:5
Shadow from the Heat-Isa25:4
Shield-Gen15:1
Sun & Shield-Ps84:11
Wall in Judah-Ezra19:9

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

It still amazes me how those in "churchdom" cannot see or figure out what is REALLY going on. What do I mean by that? To be specific, I am referring to the 1st Amendment. I'm sure you may have heard it or be familiar with. To refresh ones's memory it is: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

It's pretty simple. Even the "church" understands it. Did you know that the "church" is a tax exempt entity? If you do not know what that means, a study on your part would be good (hint, hint). 

Recently, with the veto of the bill in Georgia, people are crying out that the "church's" 1st Amendment right is being violated. When in fact, for the most part, the "church" by and large waved their 1st Amendment rights for the 501(c)3 privileges. What? You read that right. The "church", mostly out of ignorance, went to the government and asked to become a non-profit corporation and receive benefits from the government. The "church" made a "covenant", an agreement to abide by government rules so they can be a non-profit corporation. Therefore, the "church" has left their status under the 1st Amendment to receive the governments 501(c)3 status.

So the "church" must abide by what the government declares as except-able, like LGTB movement and their marriage. My blog post on 3/26/16 has shown a number of things that the "church" must abide by in order to remain compliant and not receive penalties like fines, jail time and even revocation of their non-profit status.
Why then do "churches" remain under the sanctions of the government through the 501(c)3? That is a good question! The answer will vary, but I have found that one reason is because of ignorance. They simply do not understand that they are not considered a "church" since the day they submitted to the government to be a non-profit corporation. Another reason I have found personally is money. Yes, money. Will the preacher have to get a "real" job now to support himself? Will they be able to pay the mortgage on the building? Will people stop giving if it doesn't show on their W2's? You can see why money is an issue.

Yet, what would Jesus do? Did He go to Caesar to build His "church"? No. Do we read in the book of Acts that Paul established the "church" in each community by going to the government , filling out forms, etc.? No. 

So, where does your "church" stand? If you are a non-profit, you are not really being persecuted. You are being disciplined be the government for not abiding by the agreement that you made with them. Preachers often sight Romans 13 as why we are to obey the government. They also like to use Acts 5:29 when they refuse to abide by the agreement. If your "church" would wake up and see the "truth" of their status as a non-profit corporation and NOT as a "church" you would think that they would get out of it. If they don't you will have to question why. Think of the spiritual implications. What is pleasing before God? What will you and your "church" do?

If you would like to learn more, you can read my blog post on 3/26/16 for starters.

Saturday, March 26, 2016

A week ago I sent out a link to a  "preacher"  friend mine to read that was concise and informative. The reason I sent it was because all week long he had a rant going on about the direction of this nation. I did make a comment about his ignorance on the matter and that of his friends that were praising him. One person responded to me with the same gibberish. In which I replied back and that was it. Then my "preacher" friend made a new post "I wanted to be Joshua, Gideon, David or Nehemiah but I'm Jeremiah! cry emoticon ‪#‎weepingprophet‬". Therefore I sent him a link to help open his eyes on what is wrong with our culture and "church". He has yet to even acknowledge it. Anyway, I share with you the link and a follow up letter I had prepared (with a few modifications to help the readers of this blog).

http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/501-church.html

You spoke about being like unto the prophet Jeremiah. I know you, I understand that. Yet there is another prophet that come to my mind when thinking of the "churches" spiritual condition and it may come as a surprise to you. That prophet is none other than Balaam!

You know the story how Moab tried to get Balaam to curse God's people, yet all he ever did was bless them! Yet, Balaam was greedy for gain and came up with a plan for the king to get God's people to sin through idolatry and fornication.

 14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. (KJV) Rev. 2:14

Yet, the "church" and her preachers have committed spiritual adultery with the world by joining herself with a wicked multitude, according to the arrangement and order of the government in the form of a 501(c)3.

 4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. (KJV) James 4:4

2889 ko,smoj kosmos {kos'-mos}

Meaning: 1) an apt and harmonious arrangement or constitution, order, government 2) ornament, decoration, adornment, i.e. the arrangement of the stars, 'the heavenly hosts', as the ornament of the heavens. 1 Pet. 3:3 3) the world, the universe 4) the circle of the earth, the earth 5) the inhabitants of the earth, men, the human race 6) the ungodly multitude; the whole mass of men alienated from God, and therefore hostile to the cause of Christ 7) world affairs, the aggregate of things earthly 7a) the whole circle of earthly goods, endowments riches, advantages, pleasures, etc, which although hollow and frail and fleeting, stir desire, seduce from God and are obstacles to the cause of Christ 8) any aggregate or general collection of particulars of any sort 8a) the Gentiles as contrasted to the Jews (Rom. 11:12 etc) 8a) of believers only, John 1:29; 3:16; 3:17; 6:33; 12:47 1 Cor. 4:9; 2 Cor. 5:19
Origin: probably from the base of 2865; TDNT - 3:868,459; n m
Usage: AV - world 186, adorning 1; 187

Do you realize that by being a 501(c)3 you have joined yourself to all kinds of wickedness? Look at the list of others that are also 501(c)3's. All kinds of false religions! Are we to be unequally yoked with them? Are we to have communion (joint participation) with them? Are we not called to be separate from them?

 14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?
 15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
 16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
 17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,
 18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
  7:1 Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God. (KJV) 2 Cor. 6:14-7:1

From the article I shared with you "The Truth About Church Incorporation", you should be able to see the spiritual adultery connection. Yet, I am reminded of other passages of Scripture where we are told to beware that we are not lead away from the truth unto something other than we learned from Christ. Remember the slogan "All things Bible"?

 8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. (KJV) Col. 2:8

Do you know the difference between what is lawful and was is legal? That which is lawful comes from God. That which is legal originates from man. Therefore the whole 501(c)3 is not lawful, but rather legal! Remember that Jesus told Pilate that His "kingdom is not of this world"? (Jn. 18:36)

Speaking of legal, let me ask you some questions.

1. Where in Scripture do you see the "church" going to Caesar to start a "church"? I don't remember Paul doing this on his missionary journeys.
2. Where in Scripture to we see that the giving of the saints, some refer to it as tithing, doesn't belong to the "church", rather the government, which is it's head?
3. Where do we find that the preacher needs to be licensed (ordained) by the government to be able to conduct business?

Question one, you should have receive enough information in the article I sent you to answer that. But how about number two? The article touched on it some, but I wanted to add a little more to it.
Now if people are bringing all their tithe into the storehouse (Mal. 3:10), where do we find in Scripture that they get some of their tithe back every year? If you are a 501(c)3 state "church" you get a portion of your tithe back every year! Remember "All things Bible"! So because they are bringing all their tithe into the storehouse and not robing God, the government rewards their faithfulness by giving some of it back?! How does not letting your left hand know what your right hand is doing (Mt. 6:3) apply, since all contributions are recorded, and that record is given back to them so they can prove to the government that they gave to a certain corporation ("church") that they may get some of it back? Do they have to do this? No! But most do for the money and, or on account of their ignorance on this matter. Remember, "All things Bible"!

I also like what former IRS commissioner Roscoe Edgar said, "The IRS for many years has had the right to examine church records, because churches have been collecting taxes for many years for the government; the churches therefore hold in trust that which belongs to the government. We have a right to examine church records to see if the churches are handling funds properly."

Well, how about that. I am quite sure the former commissioner knows what he's talking about. That also reminds me of something else. Why is it that so many "church" buildings are used for government elections? Could it be that they have a license from the government to conduct business? Hmm.

Where in Scripture do we find that a preacher or the school of their education is licensed or state accredited? I "searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so". (Acts 17:11) Truly, it's our Lord that gives us gifts to minister (Rom. 12, 1 Cor. 12, Eph. 4). Yet, for example, by whose authority do you marry a couple? By God's or by man? Do you sign, seal, a government marriage license? By whose authority do you join that couple together by? By man's of course!

 23 And when he was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?
 24 And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things.
 25 The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him?
 26 But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet.
 27 And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things. (KJV) Mt. 21:23-27

The following are some requirements for 501(c)3's that can be found in the Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Publication 1826 (9-94) Cat. no. 21096G, that a 501(c)3 must observe:

1.  Have a recognized creed and IRS approved form of worship.
2.  Have IRS approved code of doctrine and discipline.
3.  Have ordained ministers educated in State accredited colleges.
4.  Pastor must answer to the IRS as to daily activities of the church.
5. The IRS must be privy to all financial transactions of the church.
6.  Pastor must supply names of all donors – make books, records available.
7. Be neutral on political issues.
8. Be engaged in activities furthering exclusively public purposes.
9. Open its services to the public.
10. Submit names of all church workers; pastors, teachers, clerks, counselors, educational directors, office help, associates, and maintenance personnel.
11. Not publicly oppose licensing of church ministries.
12. Give unlimited submission to civil magistrates pertaining to all laws – federal, state, and local – including public policy.
13.  May only use IRS approved fundraising methods.

All things Bible, right! So by whose authority do you choose to function by? If you are a 501(c)3, or a licensed preacher, or have an approved degree from an state accredited institution; then your authority is by your sovereign, the state and not Jesus Christ! You may say that Jesus is the head of the body you belong to, but that doesn't make it so. You chose to leave Jesus as your head and chose the state to be your head instead.

Back in colonial times there were preachers like Isaac Backus and John Leland who had a significant impact on the matters of Church and State relations. Leland for example believed that the "Government has no more to do with religious opinions of men than it has with principles of mathematics".

In 1785, a bill came up in the Virginia Legislature to tax the people to pay pastors. The Hanover Presbyterians opposed the bill in a memorial.

Throughout James Madison's life he fought against taxing people to support pastors and against "church" incorporation. In the debate on the infamous "Religious Assessments Bill" he noted a list of the evils that would follow assessments and "church" incorporation. He believed that:

1. Regulation of religion is not within civil power,
2. Religion needs no 'artifical props'.
3. History proves religious Establishments were detrimental, and
4. These benefits would 'entangle the state' in determining which were Christian and which were heretical.

So even in Colonial America there was a push to have "churches" incorporate, yet many resisted the temptation. Why today are people so comfortable in their 501(c)3's? Knowing that it's not necessary for any "church" to go to the government to come under the umbrella of it's favors with a 501(c)3 status? So why would Jesus' disciples want to grant their jurisdiction to the IRS?  In the words of a former IRS Senior Revenue Officer, Steve Nestor:

I am not the only IRS employee who’s wondered why churches go to the government and seek permission to be exempted from a tax they didn’t owe to begin with, and to seek a tax deductible status that they’ve always had anyway.  Many of us have marveled at how church leaders want to be regulated and controlled by an agency of government that most Americans have prayed would just get out of their lives.  Churches are in an amazingly unique position, but they don’t seem to know or appreciate the implications of what it would mean to be free of government control.”  From the Forward of In Caesar’s Grip, by Peter Kershaw

I wondered that too! Yet, I also wonder why would a "church" would want to remain in Caesar's grip. Remember, all things Bible! Who are you a slave, a servant to? God? Or rather to the dictates of man? Do you honestly believe that God is pleased that you sought out someone else to be your head. A way to conduct business (the Lord's work) in a manner or pattern that you have not learned of Him from the Scriptures? Do you acknowledge God in all your ways? (Prov. 3:6)

You are one who weeps over the sins of the nation and the Lord's "church", yet you will not separate yourself from the wickedness of the 501(c)3? Examine yourself. (2 Cor. 13:5) Will you, or will you not come out? I have talked with a number of preachers about this and they all pretty much answer the same, "not now, only when we are forced to". It is my duty to share. What you do, is your choice.

Well, there is the follow up letter that I never sent due to the fact my friend didn't correspond with me on the link. To add to this topic is a list that Texe Marrs of Power of Prophecy put out in a "special report" (something that I have kept on file) from his then Living Truth Ministries which it is no longer referred to by due to it being incorporated. His new ministry no longer has attachment to the government. In this report he lists "35 prohibitions on churches and ministries" which are as follows:

1. Expose conspiracies.
    2. Criticize the New World Order
      3. Say or publish anything negative about ANY politician, Republican or Democrat.
        4. Criticize government agencies and bureaus – the IRS, FBI, BATF, CIA, EPA, DEA, OSHA, DOJ, etc. 
          5. Criticize an institution of government such as the White House, the Congress, the Federal Reserve Board (even though this is a PRIVATE corporation) or the Supreme Court.
            6. Encourage citizens to call or write their congressman, senator, governor, mayor, or other public official.
              7. Criticize any proposed or pending bill or legislation that would take away the rights and freedoms of the people.
                8. Make disparaging remarks about, or criticize, any other faith group, cult, or religion.
                  9. Expose or criticize the New Age Movement.
                    10. Support or encourage a law-abiding citizen’s militia (even though this is constitutional).

                    11. Support or encourage the Second Amendment, the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
                        12. Discourage young women from getting an abortion, or endorse the pro-life movement.
                          13. Teach that abortion, especially partial birth abortion, is murder and is the killing of innocent babies.
                            14. Identify homosexuality as a sin and an abomination to God.
                              15. Express an opinion on any subject or issue.
                                16. Appeal to peoples’ emotions by employing an evangelization method (such as “fire and brimstone” preaching) not considered a “reasoned approach” by the IRS.
                                  17. Discuss or identify threats to Christianity.
                                    18. Discuss subjects or topics the IRS deems “sensationalist.”

                                    19. Criticize well-known public figures or institutions the IRS deems “worthy,” such as the super-rich elite, international bankers, the Hollywood movie industry, etc.
                                        20. Publish or broadcast information on any topic without giving credence to the opposing viewpoints of Christ’s enemies.
                                          21. Publish and offer books, tapes, or products that expose the elitist plot against humanity and God.
                                            22. Criticize the Pope or the Vatican, or contrast the New Catholic Catechism with the truths found in the Holy Bible.  (Note: only liberal churches are permitted by the IRS to criticize the Catholic Church).
                                              23. Criticize the United Nations or such globalist groups as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, and the Trilateral Commission.
                                                24. Criticize the Masonic Lodge, the Order of Skull & Bones, or other Secret societies.
                                                  25. Highlight or otherwise bring attention to immorality of public officials or corruption in government.

                                                  26. Complain of government wrongdoing or injustice, such as happened at Waco, Ruby Ridge, and elsewhere.
                                                      27. Criticize the Jewish ADL or other Jewish lobby groups.
                                                        28. Say anything positive about the “religious right” or the “patriot movement.”
                                                          29. Support home schooling, home churches, or unregistered churches.
                                                            30. Spend money on missionary projects or charitable causes not approved by the IRS.
                                                              31. Promote or encourage alternative healthcare (herbs, vitamins, etc.).
                                                                32. Expose false teachings of any kind by anyone.
                                                                  33. Support or encourage persecuted Christians suffering under anti-Christian regimes in Red China, Cuba, Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United States, and elsewhere.
                                                                    34. Ordain a pastor whose training or qualifications are not approved by the  IRS.
                                                                      35. Advocate or teach any Bible doctrine that is politically or religiously incorrect, or is inconsistent with any “public policy” (abortion, feminism, gay rights, etc.) currently being enforced by the IRS.

                                                                      I can't help but note that in December of 1997 the IRS visited his ministry to investigate. You can learn more about that from his program titled "Is The Government Using the IRS to Takeover and ControlAmerica's Churches?" (program number 4398). Later, on a program, some time after September of 2004, titled Queers, Masons, Illuminati Con Men, And Other Televangelists (program number 4104) he made some interesting comments about his ministry saying:

                                                                      "See friends, this is why Power of Prophecy does not have 501(c)3 privileges. We have never gone to the IRS and said 'please give us tax exempt status'..." then he rants on about it for a moment then again states "No, we have never done that."

                                                                      Why he doesn't tell his audience that he was once a 501(c)3 on that program, but actually denies it is beyond me.

                                                                      Well, that is the end of this blog. Much reading for sure, with the link, the letter, and extra. Time will tell if I revisit this article. Until next time.


                                                                      Thursday, March 24, 2016

                                                                      I'm sure some of you have heard about Alabama Governor Robert Bently admitting that he made sexual comments to an adviser. If not, here is link:

                                                                      http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2016/03/gov_bentley_admits_he_made_sex.html

                                                                      Why do I bring this up? This is something that happens everyday right? True, it does, but I thought it would be good to look at this because of something that Gov. Bently said. What could that be? I the above link you can find it, but I will share it here with you. First, the news article noted that "his inappropriate comments to Mason were as far as it went." Mason being the married woman he made the comments to. He only talked dirty to her, never touched her physically. 

                                                                      Bently also said, "I want everyone to know though that I have never had a physical affair with Mrs. Mason. I can assure the people of Alabama I have never done anything illegal. I have never asked any member of my staff or any cabinet member to lie despite what the former ALEA secretary said today." Notice he said that he didn't do "anything illegal". That right there is what is wrong with our society, our culture, our nation today! Do you follow what I am saying? Let me explain it more clearly. “Legal” looks more to the letter [form/appearance], and “Lawful” to the spirit [substance/content], of the law. So, there is a difference between "legal" and "lawful". We see Jesus do this in the Book  of Matthew:

                                                                      Matthew 5:21-28

                                                                       21 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
                                                                       22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
                                                                       23 Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee;
                                                                       24 Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift.
                                                                       25 Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
                                                                       26 Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.
                                                                       27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:

                                                                       28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. (KJV)

                                                                      The last couple verses are more relevant for this topic. Jesus said that if you look at someone else to lust after them you have committed adultery already in your heart. You may never physically do the act, but entertaining the thoughts are as equal as committing the act. So Bently, apparently entertained such thoughts. As followers of Christ we are to be 'Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ". (2 Cor. 10:5) God does know our thoughts:

                                                                      Prov. 15:11

                                                                       11 Hell and destruction are before the LORD: how much more then the hearts of the children of men? (KJV)

                                                                      Jer. 17:10

                                                                       10 I the LORD search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings. (KJV)

                                                                      In any case, we know that Bently spoke inappropriate things to Mrs. Mason. Scripture tells us that we will be judged by our words:

                                                                      Matthew 12:36-37

                                                                       36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
                                                                       37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned. (KJV)

                                                                      Yet the Lord gives us much instruction on how we are to speak. The following are some examples:

                                                                      Eph. 4:29

                                                                       29 Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers. (KJV)

                                                                      Col. 3:8-9

                                                                       8 But now ye also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth.
                                                                       9 Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds; (KJV)

                                                                      Eph. 5:1-6

                                                                       1 Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children;
                                                                       2 And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.
                                                                       3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
                                                                       4 Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
                                                                       5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
                                                                       6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. (KJV)

                                                                      Notice that the wrath of God is coming for such. They are referred to as "children of disobedience". Yes, Jesus is coming again and will judge us.

                                                                      Ecc. 12:13-14

                                                                       13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
                                                                       14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil. (KJV)
                                                                      many in our nation 
                                                                      2 Cor. 5:10

                                                                       10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad. (KJV)

                                                                      Acts 17:30-31

                                                                       30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:

                                                                       31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead. (KJV)

                                                                      Therefore, we see that Bently's admission doesn't mean that he has done nothing wrong, God's Word shows us otherwise. The governor's mindset is much like many in our nation today. A "heart that deviseth wicked imaginations" is an abomination to God (Prov. 6:16-18). Don't think that you are getting off the hook when you let your imagination run wild with wicked thought! God Knows your thoughts and will judge you! He even knows every word you speak, type or text and you will have to give an account of them!

                                                                      So Gov. Robert Bently is an example to us  Are you examining yourself, whether you are in the faith? You should be!

                                                                      2 Cor. 13:

                                                                       5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates? (KJV)

                                                                      #alabamagovernorbently

                                                                      Friday, March 18, 2016

                                                                      Have you ever asked, "Where did the doctrine of the pretribulation rapture come from?", or did you just assume that it came from the pages of Scripture? The following is an article from an old acquaintance that will reveal the origin of this doctrine. It is rather a new, man-made doctrine as you shall soon see.

                                                                      X-RAYING MARGARET

                                                                      by
                                                                      Dave MacPherson


                                                                      (For several decades some pretrib leaders have deceitfully isolated Margaret Macdonald's posttrib-resembling statement "The trial of the Church is from Antichrist" to try to establish that she was posttrib. I have in mind leaders like R. A. Huebner, Charles Ryrie, Thomas Ice, and Frank Marotta. Like terrorists who destructively orchestrate mass confusion so that they can personally benefit, they had to have known that partial rapturism----Margaret's view----sees a pretrib rapture of PART of the church while also seeing the REST of the church enduring a future tribulation. The following "X-ray" is found on pp. 169-174 in my 1983 book The Great Rapture Hoax.)
                                                                      Professor Ryrie wonders how Margaret can declare that "the trial of the Church is from Antichrist" (lines 85-86) and speak of "the fiery trial which is to try us" (line 65) if the Church will "be caught up" before Antichrist arrives (lines 39-40). Apparently he's unaware of the terminology used by Partial Rapturists.
                                                                      First of all, "Church" can denote the sum total of true believers on earth at any given moment. (Actually, in a larger sense, it refers to all such believers who are to live diuring the Church age. Conceivably most of the Church is now with the Lord; they are the dead in Christ who will also participate in the catching up.) Margaret has a message for all of the Church of her time (note "all" in line 14): some will be Spirit-filled and raptured, while others will be left on earth. She thus divides the Church; those left behind are properly called "Church." She even divides the ones left behind, for "many" (lines 62, 71) will fall away and there will be "stony-ground hearers" (line 71).
                                                                      Margaret uses "us" and "we" in her second division (after the catching up) in an identifying, compassionate way----and not in a self-involving way. Again she states that "all should be filled" (line 93), but she knows that some, including possibly her friends, will be "turning from Jesus" (line 94), "not entering in" (line 95), "passing the cross" (line 97), "looking from the cross" (line 100), and so on. Although she is sympathetic towards those who won't be raptured (and doesn't really know who will be raptured), she herself wants to be in the Rapture and prays for it (lines 113-115); she doesn't expect to be left behind. (Even Hal Lindsey can use "we" while not including himself! See The 1980's: Countdown to Armageddon, pp. 28, 32. Is he himself a farmer? Has he himself seen a UFO?)
                                                                      Although Margaret employs "us" and "we" and "our" in a self-involving way in parts of her revelation, she stands back and uses detached expressions more frequently when referring to Christians: all, men, his people, those who have the light of God, those that are alive in him, spiritual temple, his body, the church, candlestick, temple, bride, she, the people of God, man, those who were filled with the Spirit, the one taken, the very elect, the real members of the body of Jesus, those...counted worthy to stand before the Son of man, the body, the servants of God, and so on. (Even in her second division she uses detached terms more frequently than "us" and "we."
                                                                      What about "Church"? Can Partial Rapturists use this term when describing those left behind after a Rapture?
                                                                      We've already noted the June, 1831 article by "Fidus" in The Morning Watch. He spoke of a first-stage catching up, then mentioned  (p. 277) "the people of God who are left, and who alone shall know the event happened to their brethren...." On page 280, while referring to the seven churches of Revelation, he mentioned "all the churches, all the seven, the complete church of Christ." (Even Laodicea, the group left behind, is part of the Church.) In the December, 1831 issue of the same journal, the same writer, speaking about the reign of Antichrist, declared on page 277: "That a part of the church shall be so tried, I believe." (Those left behind are Church members.)
                                                                      When Margaret uses "Church" in her second division, she means part of the Church----the part left behind. Do later Partial Rapturists connect "Church" with those left behind? Does later Partial Rapturism see the "Church" on earth when the Matthew 24 coming arrives?
                                                                      In an article entitled "Seven Prophetic Parables and Seven Churches" which appeared in the June, 1888 issue of The Prophetic News and Israel's Watchman, G. H. Pember wrote on p. 175: "Philadelphia, then, is taken away, but Laodicea is spued out of Christ's mouth and left behind....The Lord is not in the midst of this fallen church; He has moved outside. Yet He lingers, and knocks at the door, if, perchance, any man----not the whole Church----should hear His voice."
                                                                      Robert Govett, whom John Walvoord mentions in his latest book, included similar reasoning in his book Christ the Head; the Church His Body (1890). On pp. 194-195 he said: "'Then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man, coming in the clouds of heaven.' 'Then ye also shall be manifested together with Him in glory.' This appearing of Christ ends the Church, considered as a body under trial on the earth." (The Church, then, is still on earth after the first-stage coming, according to Partial Rapturists. And Margaret properly used "Church" when she described true believers left behind.)
                                                                      Even Walvoord unwittingly adds fuel to the fire in The Rapture Question (Revised). On p. 97 he says that Partial Rapturism teaches that only the faithful of the Church will be in the Rapture, while the rest will be raptured later on. The rest of what? Although he doesn't say it, the answer can only be the rest of the Church! If the ones left behind are the only part of the Church on earth after the Rapture, they can be described properly as the Church----the term Margaret and other Partial Rapturists have used.
                                                                      On the same page Walvoord also refers to Partial Rapturists as Pre-Tribs (Pre-Tribs who see part of the Church raptured in a first-stage coming instead of all of the Church). If today's Partial Rapturism can be labeled Pre-Trib, as Walvoord labels it, even though the earliest Partial Rapturists taught a much smaller gap than Partial Rapturists teach today, it isn't difficult to believe that Walvoord's brand of Pre-Trib also had the same small gap in its earliest days, which is exactly what we've discovered.
                                                                      Margaret and the Irvingites influenced Darby and the Brethren far more than the latter influenced the former. As we've seen, the former came up with the framework of Pre-Trib much sooner than the latter did. It isn't surprising then to find out that the earliest Brethren (and even Darby) were influenced during their initial development by Partial Rapturism!
                                                                      Although he doesn't go into much detail, Harold Rowdon's The Origins of the Brethren does reveal several early Brethren who, at the first, were under the spell of the Partial Rapturistic Irvingites; Rowdon includes (see primarily his third chapter) H. B. Bulteel, a Mr. Douglas, Captain Percy Hall (who taught a secret Rapture in 1831 at Plymouth), A. N. Groves, Lord Congleton (John Parnell), G. V. Wigram, a Mr. Clarke, J. B. Stoney----and Darby himself! (I find myself writing these words on April 29, 1982----the 100th anniversary of Darby's death.)
                                                                      Darby's Letters reveal the impression Partial Rapturism made on himself and other early Brethren. In a letter dated August 19, 1833 (Vol. 1, pp. 22-24), he mentioned that a Rev. Hardman had been promoting such a view; Hardman believed that Philadelphia would be raptured away and that Laodicea would be left behind. Darby summarizes Hardman's view of Laodicea by writing: "And then the church left in its Laodicean state...." (Note that Darby refers to those left behind as the "church"----the term Margaret and others used.) Referring again to Partial Rapturism, Darby says: "It is an important consideration in the present state of things. It commends itself morally to one's mind." Near the end of the letter Darby writes: "He will surely draw substantially His saints together before the end come, though there may be some left in...."
                                                                      In the same volume (p. 58), Darby comments on the Tribulation in an 1843 letter: "It may be some will pass through, but I am more than ever confirmed that it is not presented to our faith, but the contrary, and that the faithful will be kept from it." In the next sentence, while using the same language employed by Partial Rapturists today, he speaks of "greater faithfulness which made us escape it." In a letter written on May 1, 1848 (same source, p. 132) Darby declares: "Signs, I judge, are for those who have not been faithful enough to keep or find the bride's position...." (Note the stress on faithfulness----a Partial Rapturistic works principle.)
                                                                      In lines 82-83 Margaret misquoted part of Luke 21:36, a verse that is often used by today's Partial Rapturists. Note that she didn't use it in the usual Partial Rapturistic manner, although the Irvingites often did in The Morning Watch; "Fidus," for example, did so on p. 280 in the December, 1831 issue. In later decades many others were touched by this viewpoint. A. B.Simpson was one. In his "Queries" column (The Christian Alliance, December 7, 1894), Simpson quoted this verse and then added:    
                                                                      "It would seem perfectly clear, from these words, that those who watch and pray shall prevail to escape the Tribulation, and shall be caught up to stand before the Son of man. We cannot help believing that there will be a portion of God's true people in a state of readiness for His coming, and there will be other Christians, like the 'foolish virgins,' found unprepared, and excluded from the first and highest place in connection with His Millennial Kingdom." (Note the word "portion.")
                                                                      Today's Pre-Trib Rapture view actually sprang from a crude form of Partial Rapturism; Margaret Macdonald was followed by the Irvingites and then by the Plymouth Brethren during their early days. A person can truthfully say that gold has been discovered in a certain place even if the first gold is mixed with some silver; it's still called a gold strike. All Darby did later on was mill out the "silver"----and Pre-Trib teachers have been coming up with "pure gold" since then. (Those who reject this explanation would do well to remember that even Walvoord's latest book classifies Partial Rapturists as Pre-Tribs. Indeed, both schools of thought flow from the same headwaters.)